Depends on how and where the master was created and what source files were used. If the source files, after color correction were ProRes 422, and mastered in Final Cut then there may have been a gamma shift to 1.8. If the cc'd sources were ProRes 4444 then the gamma 2.2 would be preserved throughout. FCP changes the gamma from any source, from 2.2 to 1.8 (Apple determined viewing) except ProRes 4444, which maintains the SMPTE standard 2.2 gamma if the source was graded that way.
So to answer your question there is more usefulness for ProRes 4444 than just bit depth. As a colorist I only render to and deliver ProRes 4444. Unless rendering DPX or Tiff.


Tom Rovak - Executive Producer / Sr. Colorist / Post Production Supervisor
ROVAK COLORIST SERVICES
A Division Of The Annex Studios
Commercials, Feature Films, Music Videos, Long Form
Color Correction, Dailies, Editorial, Finish/VFX
trovak@comcast.net
(815)690-8323
Website / Commercial Reel: http://colorist-rovak.com/



From: "Ben Edwards" <list4me2@gmail.com>
To: DCPomatic@carlh.net
Sent: Saturday, August 2, 2014 5:08:42 AM
Subject: [DCP-o-matic] Prores 422 vs 4444

Been doing some digging and it seems 4444 may be overkill.  The colourspace and bit depth are higher (bit depth 12) but if this is beyond DCP is seems pointless.

Also in the preview (after file imported) when I look at same clip in 422 and 4444 the 4444 one looks pookier with better blacks and the 422 one looks a little flat/washed out.  Is this just the preview? 

Has anyone done any comparisons on high end footage?

Ben
--
Ben Edwards, Video Editor and Cameraman
web:www.nkytwig.com mobile:07773 02 44 82 skype:funkytwig twitter:@funkytwig
iContact Community Video | Bristol Community Channel

_______________________________________________
DCPomatic mailing list
DCPomatic@carlh.net
http://main.carlh.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dcpomatic