My quad core i5-3550@3.3GHz converting a dvd-clip with no extra filters clocks in at 3-3.5fps. LinuxMint 64-bit.
Adding my HTPC as an extra encoding server converts the same clip at 5-6fps. It runs adual core i3-2100@3.1GHz with HT, so 4 threads. Win7 64-bit.
This seems to suggest that HT helps with DVD-o-matic. But I'm not certain. Is it better to run your CPU with HT off and use only 2 threads, vs having HT on running 4 threads. My gcc-compiles at work do not care for HT.

Encoding servers works REALLY well!

An idea: take a specific clip with certain settings and run a benchmark to get conversion-times that are comparable. The clip you use in the manual maybe? This might be good to learn what HW is best for the money.

I will do some tests on the 2 machines at Zita and get back. Nothing really fancy, but quad core intel and amd. Not this week though.

/Adam Klotblixt


On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Carsten Kurz <audiovisual@t-online.de> wrote:

Am 13.04.2013 um 02:32 schrieb Carl Hetherington:

>
> It would be nice, and there does seem to be some evidence to suggest that a speed-up is possible.  If openjpeg did it, DVD-o-matic could use it very easily.  Sadly I don't really have the time to get into it myself just now.
>
> As it stands, more CPU wins!


Just for reference - I get around 1-1.5frames/s on my i3-2310M notebook (dualCore/4 threads, CPU 100% loaded/64bit) with no fancy filters/rescaling.

Is that 'typical'? Any 'highscorers' around? Numbers/CPU types?

Ooops - I only notice now that there is no default reply-to-mailing list set on list mails. I inadvertently only 'replied to' list mails today and thus only adressed the original senders?!

How is that?

- Carsten

_______________________________________________
DVDomatic mailing list
DVDomatic@carlh.net
http://carlh.dnsalias.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dvdomatic