21 Oct
2016
21 Oct
'16
11:17 p.m.
Hi Manuel,
As far as I know people are already doing this with DoM. The OV is signed
by somebody else's chain, the VF by yours; these signatures jus proves who
created the OV and VF and that they haven't been altered since creation.
How did your tests with DoM fail exactly?
Best,
Carl
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Manuel AC via DCPomatic wrote:
I ask for your experience on this. I never fully
understood the signing thing.
Can I create a supplemental for a signed unencrypted DCP that I didn't create?
I always thought that it's not possible, as I don't have the adequate
certificates.
I heard that an unsigned Interop supplemental may work, even with
encrypted material on the new CPL.
A couple tests with DOM failed, but I'm not really sure if it was
something else.
Thanks!
Manuel AC
--
http://akadcp.com/
https://www.facebook.com/akadcp
_______________________________________________
DCPomatic mailing list
DCPomatic(a)carlh.net
http://main.carlh.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dcpomatic