14 Oct
2014
14 Oct
'14
3:19 p.m.
Hi,
my guess :
signing makes little more complicated to modify your DCP once in the
wilderness.
It's mostly a way for "versionning" your DCP.
Signing may not be useful for DCP you only use in one place.
Am I right ?
Best regards,
Gérald
Le 14/10/2014 16:58, Manuel AC a écrit :
I tend to do it unsigned, so I can later modify the
xml files by hand
if needed. Wondering if there is any advantage on signing (not
encrypting) a DCP.
Thanks!
Manuel AC
_______________________________________________
DCPomatic mailing list
DCPomatic(a)carlh.net
http://main.carlh.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dcpomatic