Am 04.07.2017 um 14:05 schrieb Jim Dummett
<j(a)dummett.org>rg>:
Hi Carsten.
Hmm that's interesting about Resolve. The post house presented the image sequence as
being a "DCDM" which I took to mean it should already be in DCI colour space.
From all the tests I did so far, ‚white‘ or greys should never come out with a greenish
tint, but should stay perceptually white, with a slight shift towards blue after
conversion from rec709 or sRGB to XYZ, when analyzed as RGB again in an image editor. The
XYZ-TIFF the post house provided clearly shows too much green component (again, when
analyzed as RGB). When I convert to XYZ from a proper rec709 or sRGB source, the clock
white shows the blueish shift in an RGB display as expected. Most colors are off in XYZ
uncorrected, but white and grays stay neutral-blueish. Many people talk about greenish
tint when watching DCPs uncorrected, but that is not for whites, but e.g. skin tones.
http://www.knuterikevensen.com/?p=1117
Now, neither white point nor gamma are formal aspects of a source, but are ‚baked in‘ to
the file, the actual data. That’s why we need calibrated systems. If you tell someone to
create a DCDM XYZ Tiff, he needs to know, or to assume, what the original source color
space or gamma actually is. If they supply a rec709 source, they can assume color space
and gamma. But it is not guaranteed to follow rec709 specs if the film makers did not use
calibrated equipment (or equipment that is ‚close to spec‘ incidentally).
However, since the film makers are able to supply a reference rec709 oder sRGB clip with
‚their‘ white, I would assume they supplied proper footage to the post house, and that
somehow they screwed it.
- Carsten