Am 11.08.2017 um 01:43 schrieb Carl Hetherington via DCPomatic:
If you know you have graded to Rec 709 gamma 2.4 you can ignore the fact
that DoM things you are using BT1886: if you set gamma to 2.4 that's what
will be used.
I don't know if I read enough about it already, but from the document Charles quoted,
it seems that what everyone is calling Rec 709, is actually Rec 709 (the color part) with
BT.1886 gamma. It seems as if Rec 709 for historical reasons never had a proper gamma
associated with it, as Rec 709, despite now being 'THE' digital HD color space,
was conceived in the early nineties and carried the intrinsic gamma of cathode ray tube
displays with it. That was, so to say, baked-in the display technology of the days, so, at
the time they didn't see a need to formalize on this.
Later, when displays became digital flat panels, they needed a digital representation to
be compatible with existing material. And that became BT.1886, and I think that is from
2011 or so. Hardly any consumer equipment spec mentions BT.1886, but I guess, where ever
the specs say Rec 709 now, it actually means Rec 709 with a BT.1886 gamma.
Much of that is spec'd for broadcast, and to comply with consumer equipment
('TVs') and consumer expectations. They even take into account that typically, TVs
are operated in lit or dimly lit environments, and expect that some shadow detail is lost
due to these 'typical' viewing conditions, so they also assume a slight overall
gamma up-shift to compensate for that.
- Carsten