2 Jun
2015
2 Jun
'15
6:03 p.m.
Hi Lilian,
Yes, this is supposed to (and should) work fine.
Regards,
Carl
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, lilian lefranc via DCPomatic wrote:
Is it possible to install both version on any system?
It might be useful to test them in parallel...
Le 01/06/2015 17:52, Carl Hetherington via DCPomatic a écrit :
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 17:38:54 +0200
Carsten Kurz via DCPomatic <dcpomatic(a)carlh.net> wrote:
> I think one important thing could be to issue a feature-fix for 1.xx at
some
time, do only bugfixes from then on, then shift all future development to
v2.
>
> So, leave the community a 'very' stable 1.x, and then move to 2. I think
one thing is sure - once there is a v2 and the 'old' version stays where it
is, most people will naturally decide to always go for the 'latest' version.
As a matter of fact, I know a lot of people who already now download v2 (even
though it is somewhat hidden), simply because they think it must be the more
advanced version.
>
> What do you think, how did that go between DVD-o-matic and DCP-o-matic? Did
you track download numbers before/after?
I think the DVD->DCP transition went ok; I
don't remember any terrible
regressions. I might be able to fish the download stats out of the
logs.
I agree on the strategy; the main thing I want to avoid is lots of
inexperienced users downloading V2 and hitting lots of bugs. I'd
rather the old heads hit them as they know not to panic and just file
bug reports ;)
I think 1.x should be feature-frozen quite soon. I'm wasting time
forward-porting things from 1.x to 2.x as the trees have diverged too
much to allow automatic merges.
Regards,
Carl
_______________________________________________
DCPomatic mailing list
DCPomatic(a)carlh.net
http://main.carlh.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dcpomatic
_______________________________________________
DCPomatic mailing list
DCPomatic(a)carlh.net
http://main.carlh.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dcpomatic