Re: [DCP-o-matic] Understanding the log-messages - DCP-o-matic users

22 Feb 2015

On Sun, 22 Feb 2015, Andrew Levine wrote:
...
   On 22 Feb
2015, at 19:32, Carl Hetherington &lt;cth(a)carlh.net&gt; wrote:

DCP-o-matic wrote 46158 frames to disk, 143758 were already created on a
 previous run, so did not need to be encoded and written. 
 But verified with their md5-checksum, right? 
 Yes. 
 Would it be possible to skip that step? ;-) 
I think it probably would.  The original reasoning was to spot if the end
of a previous encode had been corrupted by a crash / power-cut or
whatever.  On reflection it seems more sensible perhaps to work back from
the end of the existing data and find the first frame that has the correct
checksum, then continue the encode from there.
Best regards,
Carl