22 Jan
2015
22 Jan
'15
11:54 a.m.
New EDCF Festival Guide is online:
http://www.edcf.net/edcf_docs/EDCF%20Festivals%20Guide%202014.pdf
Maybe Carl finds a place for a link to it from the DCP-o-matic site.
- Carsten
22 Jan
22 Jan
2:58 p.m.
Didn't knew about EDCF, interesting. But the guide is reeeeeally
oldschool, better than nothing I suppose.
Manuel AC
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Carsten Kurz <audiovisual(a)t-online.de> wrote:
New EDCF Festival Guide is online:
http://www.edcf.net/edcf_docs/EDCF%20Festivals%20Guide%202014.pdf
Maybe Carl finds a place for a link to it from the DCP-o-matic site.
- Carsten
_______________________________________________
DCPomatic mailing list
DCPomatic(a)carlh.net
http://main.carlh.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dcpomatic
4:27 p.m.
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 12:54:19 +0100
Carsten Kurz <audiovisual(a)t-online.de> wrote:
New EDCF Festival Guide is online:
http://www.edcf.net/edcf_docs/EDCF%20Festivals%20Guide%202014.pdf
Maybe Carl finds a place for a link to it from the DCP-o-matic site.
It's not the most optimistic document about the use of open-source DCP
creation, is it?! :)
Regards,
Carl
5:25 p.m.
Am 22.01.2015 um 17:27 schrieb Carl Hetherington:
It's not the most optimistic document about the use of open-source DCP
creation, is it?! :)
Not particularly ;-) But we Do know why, don't we?
I am sure one could compile a more compact and stringent set of recommendations targeted
to the independent film-maker.
- Carsten
5:53 p.m.
It's not
the most optimistic document about the use of open-source DCP
creation, is it?! :)
Not particularly ;-) But we Do know why, don't we?
I am sure one could compile a more compact and stringent set of recommendations targeted
to the independent film-maker.
This has really inspired me to do so. Suggestions welcomed.
Manuel AC
26 Jan
26 Jan
1:07 a.m.
Page 24 #7 clearly states that DCP-o-matic is evil.
Based on my experience in the Quebec City Film Festival and a few
others we work with through akaDCP, I will personally not endorse or
follow this document. And declare that DCP-o-matic is the real
revolution for independent producers in the digital cinema revolution
thing.
I keep reading and getting the useful bits. The work and experience
behind those lines are not to be neglected.
Bedroom encoders of the world! keep the great work!
Manuel AC
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Manuel AC <manuel.acevedo(a)civantos.com> wrote:
I suppose it depends in who is behind it. I don't really know. It get
worst, to the point of absolute non-sense.
Of course, I will not deny the great amount of work and experience
reflected in this document.
It's not the most optimistic document about the
use of open-source DCP
creation, is it?! :)
Not particularly ;-) But we Do know why, don't we?
I am sure one could compile a more compact and stringent set of recommendations targeted
to the independent film-maker.
This has really inspired me to do so. Suggestions welcomed.
Manuel AC
1:31 a.m.
Promise, it's my last message about this document :P
It proposes the use of dcp_inspect and openDCP on page 33!!! Quality
Control of the document failed at keeping open source software out ;)
Second promise of this message, I will compose a human sized document
inspired by this.
Manuel AC
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Manuel AC <manuel.acevedo(a)civantos.com> wrote:
Page 24 #7 clearly states that DCP-o-matic is evil.
Based on my experience in the Quebec City Film Festival and a few
others we work with through akaDCP, I will personally not endorse or
follow this document. And declare that DCP-o-matic is the real
revolution for independent producers in the digital cinema revolution
thing.
I keep reading and getting the useful bits. The work and experience
behind those lines are not to be neglected.
Bedroom encoders of the world! keep the great work!
Manuel AC
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Manuel AC <manuel.acevedo(a)civantos.com> wrote:
>>> It's not the most optimistic document about the use of open-source DCP
>>> creation, is it?! :)
>>
>> Not particularly ;-) But we Do know why, don't we?
>
> I suppose it depends in who is behind it. I don't really know. It get
> worst, to the point of absolute non-sense.
> Of course, I will not deny the great amount of work and experience
> reflected in this document.
>>
>> I am sure one could compile a more compact and stringent set of recommendations
targeted to the independent film-maker.
>>
> This has really inspired me to do so. Suggestions welcomed.
>
> Manuel AC
12:57 p.m.
Am 27.01.2015 um 08:39 schrieb Wolfgang Woehl:
Manuel AC:
Basically, I have given up hope on that. People don't 'read' anymore. Not even
in their native language. You can give them all they need to follow good rules, but they
keep coming back asking questions or making errors that are clearly covered in the text.
- Carsten
Promise, it's my last message about this document :P
Oh, keep them coming. It absolutely needs to be reviewed and discussed publicly.
4 Feb
4 Feb
11:51 p.m.
>I have given up hope on that
DON'T!!! Some kind of information needs to be out there, just a 75
pages book is probably not the most adequate.
Of course people don't read, and festivals are stressfull and we cut
corners and forget good practices easily.
Glossary on its own, in a web readable format that Google can index,
will be a huge help.
Study cases are really interesting, and just confirms why I got
angrier and angrier during the first pages of the document.
I will love to know more about EDCF and probably how to participate. I
suppose this list is not the best place to keep this conversation
going.
Manuel AC
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Carsten Kurz <audiovisual(a)t-online.de> wrote:
Am 27.01.2015 um 08:39 schrieb Wolfgang Woehl:
Manuel AC:
Basically, I have given up hope on that. People don't 'read' anymore. Not
even in their native language. You can give them all they need to follow good rules, but
they keep coming back asking questions or making errors that are clearly covered in the
text.
- Carsten
_______________________________________________
DCPomatic mailing list
DCPomatic(a)carlh.net
http://main.carlh.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dcpomatic
Promise, it's my last message about this document :P
Oh, keep them coming. It absolutely needs to be reviewed and discussed publicly.
5 Feb
5 Feb
9:04 p.m.
Am 05.02.2015 um 00:51 schrieb Manuel AC:
I will love to know more about EDCF and probably how to participate. I
suppose this list is not the best place to keep this conversation
going.
More on the EDCF festival guide:
http://celluloidjunkie.com/2015/01/07/edcf-guide-highlights-film-festivals-…
- Carsten
3734
days inactive
3748
days old
10 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Carl Hetherington -
Carsten Kurz -
Manuel AC -
Wolfgang Woehl