It has transpired that around noon GMT on 16th April the DCP-o-matic project in
our bug database was deleted by actors unknown. It appears that they gained
administrator rights in our installation of the Mantis bug tracker.
If you have a Mantis account and you use the same password on any other sites
you are strongly advised to change this password everywhere it is used.
At the moment I don't think anything else on dcpomatic.com was compromised.
The bug tracker has been restored from a backup and I don't think much has been
lost. If you added a bug or comment since 16th April you will need to re-add
it.
Apologies for any inconvenience.
Kind regards,
Carl
Thank you for your script, Wolfgang.
Today, I finally managed to install it on my machine and ran the inspection
using it to find out I had no errors with my InterOP DCP I had created
earlier this week.
It gave me many hints related to Digital Cinema Naming Convention, but no
errors.
By the way, I'd like to give you a feedback on what your script might not
have caught, but since I have the trial version of easyDCP player, it won't
show me what the actual warning it gave me. So, unfortunately, I don't
think I can help you about it.
Thank you all for your replies once again!
Best regards,
S.N.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Carsten Kurz <audiovisual(a)t-online.de>
wrote:
> As a side note, today I created a basic DCP with DOM 2.10.9 Mac and played
> it with the most current demo version of EazyDCP Player Mac. I did not get
> a warning and was able to play the file (as much as the demo allows).
>
> There are not many ways to create a formally screwed DCP with DCP-matic.
> To the extent that currently, if a software player complains about a formal
> issue, I'd blame the software player first.
> There has been a similar issue once with the Doremi Cineplayer. Yes, if in
> doubt, try to use dcp_inspect.
>
> - Carsten
>
> ... gesendet von unterwegs
>
> Am 20.03.2017 um 18:11 schrieb Shanu Novic <shanunovic(a)gmail.com>:
>
> Thank you all for your replies.
>
> C J,
>
> The version I have used is 2.10.2 git a23d6161d9, which I think is the
> current version from the website.
> Thank you very much for your kind offer to help.
>
> Carsten,
>
> I think that's an known issue with easyDCP Player, and I'm surprised they
>> didn't fix it yet. I can't look up earlier posts describing the problem
>> from here. Maybe someone else can.
>
>
> I was thinking that might be the case, but I could not find any recent
> posts about it in dcp-o-matic forums that I started to have a doubt.
>
> S.N.
>
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:00 AM, cjflynn(a)digitaltesttools.com <
> cjflynn(a)digitaltesttools.com> wrote:
>
>> Shanu
>>
>> Could you please tell the version number of DCP-o-Matic that you used,
>> which got that error? If I have that version, I can try a DCP and see if I
>> get the same results.
>>
>> C J
>> Cinema Test Tools <http://cinematesttools.com>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 20, 2017, at 02:25 000AM, Carl Hetherington via DCPomatic <
>> dcpomatic(a)carlh.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Shanu,
>>
>> It could be. I guess there's no way to be sure. Someone else on the list
>> might have an idea... Sorry I can't be more help.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Carl
>>
>> On Sun, 19 Mar 2017, Shanu Novic wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> I just created a DCP using DCP-o-matic, but when I try to play it with
>> easyDCP trial version, it gives me warnings.
>> It says "Issues have been detected. For a full report, please license the
>> commercial edition with issue report enabled", so I don't know what the
>> exact
>> issue is.
>>
>> Do you think it's the XML one that's listed under FAQ on your website?
>> Does it always happen with DCPs created using DCP-o-matic?
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Carl Hetherington <cth(a)carlh.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:34:41 +0900
>> Shanu Novic via DCPomatic <dcpomatic(a)carlh.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>>
>> Hi Shanu,
>>
>> I had a quick question.
>>
>> What's the difference between DCP-o-matic and Davinci Resolve (without
>> using easyDCP plugin) in terms of how they convert source material into
>> jpeg2000 (XYZ color space)?
>>
>> My master video is Apple Prores HQ.
>>
>> Basically, I have used Davinci Resolve (without using easyDCP plugin) and
>> openDCP to make a DCP in the past, and I was successful, but Davinci
>> Resolve crashes randomly sometimes these days, so I wanted to give
>> DCP-o-matic a shot.
>>
>>
>> I'm afraid I don't know what Resolve does. In theory they should be
>> the same, since there is a pretty-well defined mathematical operation
>> that should be followed to convert video to XYZ.
>>
>> Someone else on the list might know...
>>
>> I guess I can just do a test conversion with DCP-o-matic and check the
>> result with my eyes, but I thought it wouldn't hurt to ask...
>>
>>
>> That would be a good starting point, I think.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Carl
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DCPomatic mailing list
>> DCPomatic(a)carlh.net
>> http://main.carlh.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dcpomatic
>>
>>
>>
>
Hello everyone,
I had a quick question.
What's the difference between DCP-o-matic and Davinci Resolve (without
using easyDCP plugin) in terms of how they convert source material into
jpeg2000 (XYZ color space)?
My master video is Apple Prores HQ.
Basically, I have used Davinci Resolve (without using easyDCP plugin) and
openDCP to make a DCP in the past, and I was successful, but Davinci
Resolve crashes randomly sometimes these days, so I wanted to give
DCP-o-matic a shot.
I guess I can just do a test conversion with DCP-o-matic and check the
result with my eyes, but I thought it wouldn't hurt to ask...
If anyone with the knowledge could kindly inform me about it, I'd be much
appreciated!
Best regards,
S.N.
Hi There,
No need for help at this point. I found the package. The directory
structure is a little different. I just had to look.
Cheers.
scott.
-----Original Message-----
From: Heddon Greta Drive-in [mailto:admin@drive-in.com.au]
Sent: Sunday, 19 March 2017 7:47 PM
To: 'dcpomatic(a)carlh.net'
Subject: No Packages Found
Hi Carl.
I hope all is well.
I am trying to use your program for the first time.
I obtained it from the classifications division and installed it from
the business card USB they circulated.
I am following the instructions in the word file they included.
I am trying to make a silent DCP with a "No Smoking announcement of 10
seconds.
It all seems to work OK but when I try to load the package onto the GDC
Server I can see the folder I have made but when I try to ingest I get
the message "No Packages Found".
I have looked in the folder. It seems to have files with bits in them...
Just wondering if there might be anything silly I could have done??
Appreciate your thoughts.
Many thanks,
Scott.
Kind Regards,
Scott Seddon
Heddon Greta Drive-in
Scotty's Cinemas Pty Ltd
Hi Carl.
I hope all is well.
I am trying to use your program for the first time.
I obtained it from the classifications division and installed it from
the business card USB they circulated.
I am following the instructions in the word file they included.
I am trying to make a silent DCP with a "No Smoking announcement of 10
seconds.
It all seems to work OK but when I try to load the package onto the GDC
Server I can see the folder I have made but when I try to ingest I get
the message "No Packages Found".
I have looked in the folder. It seems to have files with bits in them...
Just wondering if there might be anything silly I could have done??
Appreciate your thoughts.
Many thanks,
Scott.
Kind Regards,
Scott Seddon
Heddon Greta Drive-in
Scotty's Cinemas Pty Ltd
Not strictly related to DCP-o-matic - but does anyone know a way to edit bitmap subtitle streams in e.g. VOBs from a DVD? DCP-o-matic allows to change size, position and color. Wondering wether it was possible to add a list view - and then, as once proposed for timed text, allow to edit in/out times, shift titles, erase individual titles?
Wondering wether there could be a way to turn this all compatible with PNG subtitles? After all, there is not so much difference in handling between bitmap subs and PNGs. Would be cool if both could be dealt with through the same interface!
- Carsten
When did this happen?!!!
Carl! How you dare not making a big announcement for it!
By the way, congratulations for finally getting rid of the
celluloid-thingy in a DCP-thingy logo...
Manuel AC
--
http://akadcp.com/https://www.facebook.com/akadcp
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, GEORGE MAZARAKIS wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
> I had encrypted SMPTE problems also with Doremi servers.
Come now ... tell me more!
Carl
>
> I'm sure for an IMS DOREMI with 2.6.6 version software and i think with
> DCP 2000.
>
> George
>
>
> On 14/2/2017 2:00 μμ, dcpomatic-request(a)carlh.net wrote:
> > Send DCPomatic mailing list submissions to
> > dcpomatic(a)carlh.net
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > http://main.carlh.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dcpomatic
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > dcpomatic-request(a)carlh.net
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > dcpomatic-owner(a)carlh.net
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of DCPomatic digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. Re: Exporting a decryption certificate (Carl Hetherington)
> > 2. Re: SMPTE by default (Carl Hetherington)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 21:46:10 +0000 (GMT)
> > From: Carl Hetherington <cth(a)carlh.net>
> > To: Tom Haines <thaines(a)specticast.com>
> > Cc: dcpomatic net carlh <DCPomatic(a)carlh.net>
> > Subject: Re: [DCP-o-matic] Exporting a decryption certificate
> > Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1702132145380.4765(a)main.carlh.net>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> > On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Tom Haines via DCPomatic wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks everyone for the help. It turns out the mastering facility used the signing keys instead of the decrypting keys.
> >> The DKDM issued with the decrypting keys works.
> >>
> >> Interestingly, this did uncover a crash situation.
> >> 1. I created a new project
> >> 2. I imported the DCP using "Add Folder..."
> >> 3. Right clicked on the DCP in the content window selected Add KDM
> >> 4. Selected the original KDM the mastering facility incorrectly produced.
> >> 5. I receive the "An exception occurred: Could not decrypt KDM (error:0407A079:rsa routines:RSA_padding_check_PKCS1_OAEP:oaep decoding error)." error message
> >> 6. I clicked back on the imported DCP in the content window, and DoM crashed.
> >> This happened in 2.9.0 and 2.10.2 running on macOS Sierra 10.12.2.
> >>
> >> When I have a second today, I'll download the test build and see if it happens there as well.
> > Thanks Tom, I believe this bug is already on the to-do list. I will
> > investigate.
> >
> > All the best,
> > Carl
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> SpectiCast
> >> Tom Haines :: Executive Director of Digital Cinema Services
> >>
> >> 210 W Rittenhouse Sq, Ste 400 | Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA
> >>
> >> Office: 215-618-3874 | Mobile: 484-269-8227 | Skype: tom.haines41
> >>
> >> Facebook | Twitter | Google+ | Instagram | Tumblr
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Tom Haines <thaines(a)specticast.com> wrote:
> >> At the moment it looks like the DKDM was issued against the signing veers and not the decrypting certainty.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 3:03 AM Carsten Kurz via DCPomatic <dcpomatic(a)carlh.net> wrote:
> >> I remember that I had an issue after I had been working with, and updating DCP-o-matic for a long time on the same machine. I couldn't issue
> >> working certificates for a DKDM.
> >>
> >> 'Recreate certificates and keys' solved that issue. Something in preferences must have been mixed up over so many version updates.
> >>
> >> However, I guess before doing that, exporting the current chain and saving it under a name of the current date and DOM version before that may be
> >> a good idea. Depends on what you had been working on before.
> >>
> >> - Carsten
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> DCPomatic mailing list
> >> DCPomatic(a)carlh.net
> >> http://main.carlh.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dcpomatic
> >>
> >> --
> >> SpectiCast
> >> Tom Haines :: Executive Director of Digital Cinema Services
> >>
> >> 210 W Rittenhouse Sq, Ste 400 | Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA
> >>
> >> Office: 215-618-3874 | Mobile: 484-269-8227 | Skype: tom.haines41
> >>
> >> Facebook | Twitter | Google+ | Instagram | Tumblr
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 21:57:24 +0000 (GMT)
> > From: Carl Hetherington <cth(a)carlh.net>
> > To: dcpomatic carlh net <dcpomatic(a)carlh.net>
> > Subject: Re: [DCP-o-matic] SMPTE by default
> > Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1702132156160.4765(a)main.carlh.net>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> > Hi Manuel,
> >
> > I think, on the whole, I'd like to wait a little longer: at least until
> > we've got to the bottom of the encrypted SMPTE problems with Sony systems.
> >
> > It's interesting to hear the state of the US big releases though: thanks!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Carl
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Manuel AC via DCPomatic wrote:
> >
> >> Just seeing the numbers from wide releases in US. Basically, non-SMPTE theaters are not relevant anymore. Some major studios are already nearly fully SMPTE,
> >> theaters that didn't do the minimal updates will do them now, for sure.
> >>
> >> I would insist in going back to default to SMPTE as the standard for new installs.
> >>
> >> Manuel AC
> >> --
> >> http://akadcp.com/
> >> https://www.facebook.com/akadcp
> >>
> >>
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Subject: Digest Footer
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DCPomatic mailing list
> > DCPomatic(a)carlh.net
> > http://main.carlh.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dcpomatic
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > End of DCPomatic Digest, Vol 54, Issue 2
> > ****************************************
>
>
Just seeing the numbers from wide releases in US. Basically, non-SMPTE
theaters are not relevant anymore. Some major studios are already nearly
fully SMPTE, theaters that didn't do the minimal updates will do them now,
for sure.
I would insist in going back to default to SMPTE as the standard for new
installs.
Manuel AC
--
http://akadcp.com/https://www.facebook.com/akadcp
