My quad core i5-3550(a)3.3GHz converting a dvd-clip with no extra filters
clocks in at 3-3.5fps. LinuxMint 64-bit.
Adding my HTPC as an extra encoding server converts the same clip at
5-6fps. It runs adual core i3-2100(a)3.1GHz with HT, so 4 threads. Win7
64-bit.
This seems to suggest that HT helps with DVD-o-matic. But I'm not certain.
Is it better to run your CPU with HT off and use only 2 threads, vs having
HT on running 4 threads. My gcc-compiles at work do not care for HT.
Encoding servers works REALLY well!
An idea: take a specific clip with certain settings and run a benchmark to
get conversion-times that are comparable. The clip you use in the manual
maybe? This might be good to learn what HW is best for the money.
I will do some tests on the 2 machines at Zita and get back. Nothing really
fancy, but quad core intel and amd. Not this week though.
/Adam Klotblixt
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Carsten Kurz <audiovisual(a)t-online.de>wrote;wrote:
Am 13.04.2013 um 02:32 schrieb Carl Hetherington:
It would be nice, and there does seem to be some evidence to suggest
that a
speed-up is possible. If openjpeg did it, DVD-o-matic could use it
very easily. Sadly I don't really have the time to get into it myself just
now.
As it stands, more CPU wins!
Just for reference - I get around 1-1.5frames/s on my i3-2310M notebook
(dualCore/4 threads, CPU 100% loaded/64bit) with no fancy filters/rescaling.
Is that 'typical'? Any 'highscorers' around? Numbers/CPU types?
Ooops - I only notice now that there is no default reply-to-mailing list
set on list mails. I inadvertently only 'replied to' list mails today and
thus only adressed the original senders?!
How is that?
- Carsten
_______________________________________________
DVDomatic mailing list
DVDomatic(a)carlh.net
http://carlh.dnsalias.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dvdomatic