On the same-ish subject, a friend also received a rejection of a DCP
made with DCP-o-matic earlier this year from Technicolor Deluxe.
They said:
"CPL-INFO FAIL: (HARD FAILS)
Unlabeled audio essence, assuming 5.1 Format (requires audio rewrap)
MXF (xx-xx_audio_01.mxf) is SMPTE sound without WTF channel format.
(SMPTE Requires WTF audio)
It was not able to load for a Full Internal QC due to the server not
being able to read the correct SMPTE audio mapping format.
Please note, Deluxe Technicolor can make the fixes. They would un-wrap
then re-wrap the audio and make the DCP Interop so there are no issue in
the field with being a non-ATMOS SMPTE DCP. The cost to fix is ~$900."
This DCP was made on v1.83.0 (or maybe a slightly earlier version). I
didn't mention it at the time, as I figured it was probably fixed in
DCP-o-matic v2.x so wouldn't be much use reporting it.
I've got to say, in practice of the hundreds of DCPs I've now made with
DCP-o-matic which have screened all over the place in the UK, we've
never had a fault which wasn't traced back to a fault in the filmmaker's
source file. It feels to me that Deluxe are rather splitting hairs. But
I guess that's how they make their money!
Jim
On 07/09/2016 10:38, Eggert Baldvinsson via DCPomatic wrote:
Hi just sent a film encoded with DCP Omatic to TIFF
film festival.
It was rejected.
Here is the info from Technicolor
#1: The video mxf does not contain a
"Random Index Point
(RIP)"/ The file format is not proper OP-Atom/AS-DCP. This fails
Wailua and ADSCP.
bkv. / with regards
Eggert Baldvinsson
Senior Colorist
eggert(a)rgb.is <mailto:eggert@rgb.is>
+354-6995444 mobile
+354-4142040 desk
_______________________________________________
DCPomatic mailing list
DCPomatic(a)carlh.net
http://main.carlh.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dcpomatic